Conservative Foray (4A)

The right wing rhetoric suffers
from four faults or defaults:
Anecdotal
Apocryphal
Anachronistic
Academic[*]

In particular:
Lew Rockwell
Anne Wortham
Betsy McGaughey
Floy Lilley **

I did not select these, they were being spread by a victim of the victim hoods.

[* This 4A was held in draft, and pondered till I arrived at the right Initialism. Speaking of design and initialism the origin was:
often A$$ Backward Oops!! - Pardon my Cheney , I meant acronym-ism.]

**[Hopefully I have these in descending order.]
[(CTTC)Cutting through the Cr@p:
I would love for economists to cut through some of this.]
[Academic is a word like politician and lawyer that have developed a poor reputation, not to mention rhetoric and Swift Boaters. Or Bottom Line? ]

[(CTTC2.0)I have two bold links above that I would like economists to examine, in particular in light of the bad rap Keynesian economics keeps taking. In that regard, on a lighter and less silly or harsh note; Greenspan seems to be learning, or has he, and in regards to the Floy piece and the bottom line;
is there not some synergy that needs to be worked out? Meaning current efforts cannot be compared to past efforts directly, while problems that are missed will be the devil in the detail. The Carbon Market may be a solution, but not if the Market period is the problem. In other words, I have not looked too deeply into the hot air side (climate matters) of the equation, but feel that the thin air problem (financial matters)is deeper. To re-embed in aphorism, there is bang for your buck and there is the value of your bang. And there is likely more that matters.

Footnotes Page4 August 2013

8-5-13 [?]: (s.c.) a.  Fiddle Sticks^ , b., c., d. e., f. Moos Room /?
A for August need to ReVamp Heading {see brackets next}

{8-9-13} The Oh Gen Duh?(b.s.) a.(Brackets and the Debt Clock), b., c.(The Curve or Nuance Thing), d.(Woof Woof?), e. Two Evils? Or flippin flop?, f., g., h.Game+Lock, i., J. Trouble with the Curve?  { ! )

8-22-13  Teddy Bull and Pit Bull @ UOB: U- A.Connecting the Dots, B, C,  D.No Teddy[!], The Straw Bear / B-. A., b.Connecting the Dots, C. /// Tool Shed- A.Inconvenient , B., The Real B. S. of the F. C., Nail Meet F--C---[!], E.Irony versus Hypocrisy

8-26-13: Lemon Ship *** Pun on Aster Risks (To Ctrl F Initialism) A. Conservative Foray (4A) B. Initialism, C. Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)** , D.Child's Play   

8-28-13 A Black and White Chat is not about colors or races, but spectrums, polarities(knot exactly), and dimentions.

Child's Play

Freak Show vs. Bogeyman:

The Lyin' King?

While my original intent was the feeling that this is getting old, or rather childish. Then to see the nature of the exchange on Morning Joe, it takes some perspectivising.* Martin Bashir covers another aspect of the picture show. Back to the future, I mean Morning Joe, who is in the drivers seat? Mika or Joe? The image of President Obama getting into a car at an auto show. Who is in the drivers seat? Politically the President is. But it is like one of those drivers-ed cars with a second wheel and brakes on the passenger side, and congress is in that seat. But with Batman, I mean Bashir on West, Republicans would have no message if they did not have imagined monsters: "equality of achievement", "economic dependency"and "enslaving".

So...bottom line, Political is a double-edged sword. There is the race and there is the economy. Congress plays a role in both, and negative is not just ugly, it can have actual facts. So Mika can say that Obama is behind the wheel. And Joe can say he is not. Now you may see that the president is not the only one in the car, with a hand on the wheel.

* not that I take the Mediaite perspective (Donny Deutsch made a reasonable point, see negative/ugly/facts.)

[Not to call it a hatefest, just a hecuvafest.]

[Not to rob Peter to pay Paul. See Freudian/Austrian. Lit-urgeical hint]

[Couched Analogy?]

[not to leap fest** but I am missing a piece on certainty***.]

[Action item: FEC apointments & expired terms]

** tba: no pun on SBA, but to be arranged

*** dba? a pun/myst on the "free market" need(see drives-ed car) for certainty

[BTW: if you need GPS, why not Ctrl F frackin' fudgin"? Pun with acronyms, not to mention initialism. Speaking of caricatures and labelism.]

Initialism

Not to pun on Recreationism [!]

But Crypto Political Science deals with a more dimentional political spectrum of global exceptionionalism.  (FP1)

(not there yet)
In the begining...
Long Story

BLANK NETWORK (scroll click){Paper U?}
{Re insert} Speaking of Pre Post or Us ... Knowwww!!!!*

* Colbert Daft Anachronism
(MSNBC search for "Failed States" flailed bridges)

{OK, the original sentiment is that there is politics of a third kind^.  Not just the libertarian(6) , but international perspectives (14) that clash with the old partisan ships. The glint of tinfoil(17) is actually a tool in the shed of progress that cannot be emptied by executive order**.  There is a war on terrorism, it was declared by congress, and the president is the commander-in-chief.  It is tough enough dealing (f.c.)^^ with adversarial states, let alone protect America from it's legacy(such as it is)*** in a world that is changing, from the global to the local.  Crypto Political Science as I have coined it relates, to the wise crack of perception being reality.  Knot[!] to mention, truth being the first casualty in war.  It his hard enough dealing with a divided congress, let alone pre-constitutional or crypto-political organizations.}

** Ctrl F/papa
*** history in general/leading in particular(b.s.)
[OBAMA AM/Tonight Show: Changing the box ... of Tetra Heed Run.]

^ Embassy closings cover for actions or prudence in the unfolding middle-c of Turkey and Yemen?  [To The Point ?]
(The Point *link* is yet to be inserted: an NPR report on Terrorism.  A tangent? Who would be the counter-balance to Alan Simpson?  But where is Joe Scarborough? LET ALONE THE CYCLE.) 

[8-9-13 P.S.] ^^(f.c.)4ment change see (6)th link "dimentional". Let alone the Point !

9-18-13 FP$

C-Cap or Decap(4): A. Rock, Paper, Scissor? , B. , C. CU T-party , D. An Inconvenient Platonics? , e. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy.

9-27-13 game / theory : A.(1), B.(2) Conservative Foray (4A), B. Dancing and Company II , C. Wise Crack, D. Initialism , E. Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)** , F. Child's Play / / A. C3-PO? , B.(1), C. The Other Debates , D. Karl Rove vs. WA Hyperbole , E. Toll Keen, the Try-Logy? F. Toll Keen?

FC
(1) A,periodB.
(2) as opposed to D. B.

Dancing and Company II

Not that I checked one. (FP1)
The Polar Cracks continue [!]. (FP2)
Not that these R Jansing & Co.
(Thomas Roberts: "Awkward"!?!)
There R domestic and international politics.
Initialism: (FE) fudging exceptionalism. (or was it EF?) 
(MR. "feeding frenzy") (TR: TD "tone deaf"? Not "TZ" but TP? "rally round" who? Syria-US-lee?)

9-13-13: Label added. (FP1) Meaks? Not to continue the spell check. "&","awkward","TZ" or TD!. 
The Oh genda.
Twilight Zone Diplomacy, "awkward",  Meaks !(to update) eek? ? eak!

★Re-initialism★

Major Fail or ... Hume or ? ... *

* Too Random...

(Pre-post-or-us ?)
{Note # labels.  Not to frac' or fudge.}

The point is that I finally read this piece(see bold Hume) which is very Hegelian.
~~~
I have also yet to insert ma hat pa mamby. ~~~ **
~~~

[  MF'4  ]  4-30-14

[5-1-14 Incidentalism?  Who started it {?}]
~~~ Sandel/Huntington Revisited ~~~
** photos still on tablet

Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)**

Not to spike the ball. 
Mandate will become a tax!

Well... that was my idea or interpretation of the bill, but that was FOX News' claim.
But my original ball that might have been a spike was "Democrats Upheld" but Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a bi-partisan bill, so I cannot claim a victory for Democrats.  It is a victory for congress and the political progress.  It is a victory for Obama and bi-partisanship.  Not that victory is a Burger King*, or having it my way.  I should admit that recently I thought that part of the ruling would be kicking the can down the road, since some of the provisions don't go into effect till 2014. 
Oops, in plain English, I may have been right about the can.
Senator Dan Coates on Jansing&Co. claimed lack of bi-partisanship.  That claim is a victory for politics and bi-partisanship.  The ACA was passed under reconciliation.  It was not a Democratic bill, but a democratic bill.  If the President can be blamed(see choice/bold-underlined) for congress not getting things done, when the Republicans obstruct with filibusters.  Republicans cannot have all the changes they could get and not take credit for them by voting against the bill to claim partisanship by not being able to filibuster. 
If anything this is a vaccine to the insanity of the partisan Issa Committee which doctor for the NRA. 
Pump it up! Obama Cares !  Chris Matthews has a very interesting Stupid Conspiracy.  On the other hand, I thought that the obvious was missing in the court arguments.  I think that means that it was plain that a loss of tax break is not a penalty, or is it the semantics of taxes.

* whose weigh or beef?
** still looking for the bullet ratio aka up 'n over or held/turned [People/$]
[of and for the people, over money]
[The real in'f-fable might be taxes/commerce. The High Five ?  4GETIT?
It is a win for Politics, Bi-Partisanship, Obama, and the Economy!  But according to Raw Money?  "A Choice"... between Government standing between you and big corporations or big corporations standing between you and your health care.(Bold over underlined ? )]
Not to strike a punchline, but bottomline:  Obama is Bush! A Political Capitalist!
Romney is Kerry!  A nuanced flip-flopper.  But only in the light of...(the president speaks)***

(asterisked anachronism888baneORspeaks.)

***  TBA
[Coff E T A B L E ]
[AM H&H game change? Tweet Morning Joe! ET? MR doc RM RL btw: NFIB v. SSHH$ ]
[PC v MF ! (?)]

(photo credit)

[Hi5-4th'tableCongressISjobWON!]
[Congress is open to a peel!]

[I don't have the rest of the story to back this up, but I think that Norman Goldman analyzes NFIB v. SSHHS the way I have.  Not only that but Justice Thomas or the D$ent may have bust the fallacy that health care is commerce.  Not only that but I think that Justice Roberts figured out how it can work or not work depending on congress, as I think that congress could have if they had more cooperation rather than partisanship.  NorMan really cut through it with a caller, regarding small business and Mitt RobbedMe.  How do you know when Mitt is telling a lie?  He is either talking about Obama or economics, if not both at the same time. Just between me and we, it seems that without fully reading the Affordable Care Act or the full decision, the Supreme Court seems to have understood it better than it was argued, but not much more than I thought it was.  The catch is that we are patching together various interpretations that make a decision that still takes some tweaking by congress.  It puts taxes and states at the table.  The catch seems to hinge on the powers of congress and the definition of commerce.  As Chris Matthews was want to call it a Stupid Conspiracy, I may lean toward calling it a Swift Strategy, despite the games some play with acronyms, initialism or caricatures.]
NG
GN
UP v UC
Unprecedent President vis a vis Unprecedented Congress.
Now that is PC! Due(or vu doo) the Math!
(Bush/Obama x Obstructive/Health Care)
[I would like to thank three people for helping me understand GeOhMeTry[!] Randi Rhodes, Lawrence O'Donnel and Michael [links 6-29] Moore... Well...there are host of others but in particular RR and LO, have brilliant insight if not intel.  Randi a quick take on Obama, Lawrence an understanding of the political process, and MM a way with the message and the medium.  MR-RM.
Plausible Deniability/Plausible Incompetence/ Deniable Competence. That is the voodoo some do.
[Upheld -  U p h e l d !]

Bin(un)Jun'Go

2 links
in progress.
Steve Smith (watching)in progress. [('n Strauss)!]

Previous reference and reL8ted viewings.

i.p. Fukuyama/Kaplan...

(ReLabelism)
[/] 1. (FP!) , 2. Proof of Life... 3. The Hope
i.p.  1.  ★Re-initialism★ , 2. Mises... , 3. Cultural Threads are Fine. 4.  Neo-Context

March Forth ?  [Lost in the Phrey?]

3-5-15: 1st things (above 'n labels!). 
Lede or Ship? [C-font!] (intro/content/) (heading/goal?)
Bin- parsing of bingo and un-circular file / (un)~Jung or circular / Go~Hegelian [!]
Line 3 some articles and links re: Steve Smith (Straussian?)
L4: PR& Strauss Lectures.

Note: It may not be obvious, but I don't always get back to read everything labeled NFRY or NFR.
While NFR may mean not necessarily needing to, NFRY indicates a hope to.  Then
fortuitus $hits happen.  Like the opening of the last link(LM frying pan), and the parsing of 4-2-it-us?  Not to men shun(A2~?)   [ahhhh! ???] Let alone one liners.*

Now to the^^ point at the mo'ment.  Acon Ference? **

*(FPip)(???)~ The Un-Revolved(~) Thread / (ahhh)~ commercial goat scream / (?)~Jenga / (A2)~et tu / (shun) USCroll click / (men)~[lost or redone'dented] / (to)~Jung& / GnotS

** a file of sorts un red[!]or yetT for 2? (Or tent4text) /~gno-M~BA
Loose unMbeds? O'w[!]? ^
^D'Ribble saved in draft
^^ 2B read and viewed
[ final note !: that's the ticket ? ] ( fp: Still in draft? ) [knot necessarily gunuh]
fur cation?




Saux?(~\~) ow~/~ew what?



That's what!

Dukes or Hazzards

Or
Perils* of Paul-ien**? 

*NYTimes subscription required or use of your alloted limit:
(in lieu of scroll click) David Brooks ~ Building Better Secularist
**NFRY: reading in progress former(*) embedded in latter(**)

Rather than further annotate or embed links... (dot, dot, dot)
TBS(2 B S...) Fukuyama Strauss
2. ★Re-initialism★ / Mises... / Cultural Threads are Fine. / Neo-Context ?
B. SHOCK and AWE(UPDATE) /\ /, Give 'em a break! //,  Mises... /,  Technical Difficulties  /?/, GOLEFT TV [!]
S.  E A R C H : Flash Back, Fast Forward, Regime Rhetoric Reply, Open Threads.

[or / of rawls ? P'op'e ?]

Wise Crack

That's the heading,
here is the lede. 
Then there is the crack.*

Grand Funk"s (Into The Sun)[6] is a crack at the journalism(or perspective) of The $un[1,5].  An alternative being considered in the Senate is found under "heading"(Sam Stein)[2].  A reference to the Dean "Scream" brings us to some resolution[3,4]. 

*Format note: M-bedded links[1-6]
(FP1)

[NOW \ AM...  Senator Manchin is on Andrea Mitchell(earlier** NOW references needed***) but here is an un-opened email in this regard.]
** I Ron Knee(Verification Regime) or Thomas Roberts
*** today(re:initialism)
[Not to mention: Mess Aging ?  Obama met with 6 networks. Segue: journalism and party dimentionalism. See bold.]

Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?

* (FP?)

Bane or Song,
Dutch Treat,
Trans-Parent C?
pair a digm / docs
who
ran A. The Maze of Mace, B. C3-PO?, D.TBA, E. Fair and Balanced..., F. Parallel (Or Not So Pair o' Lax) Channels
off


clock A., B. 11-30-11 , C. Reigning Wags and Tales. D. Refrain Post Frain?, E. Cut the Cow Pie! , F., G. Anachronism , H. I. Leveling the World Stage? , J. Initialism, K. L.


* 1. Spenserian Neo-Platonics?
2. All In?
3. Neo-Romulan
4. A. Speculative Physics, B., C. Pre-Pan FRY. , D. Clause Wits, E. Battle of Amendments?

Z Y X[?] budda bias?

New Jersey?

Original Heading: Smoking Bridge?
Dated uncertain if 1-13 or 1-14-14

What is it with Republican's and Bridges?

Pardon my relative lack of sources

1-15-14 Traffic Study? A. Initialism , B. The Nightmare Act C?

1-29-14 Tea for the Tillerman

[Note: Facetious Time Stamp 2014]

Divide to conquer?

Or back fire*?

This is a geometrical analysis of the partisan nature of politics.  We are familiar with the terms Fiscal and Social Conservative. But then there is the un-like Ike wing** and the Atlas Shrugged foundation or ^ fountain.  Here I may have already divided, to fight on.  I will try to keep the links and notations down. 

From what was earlier work on The Third Way, akin to the moving the center off the absolute, the moderate left seems to be moving the country.(See 1st link).  But is more than about geometrics of the left and the right and there being a middle.  If conservatives have branches(BTW the gov meant has three^^^); the FC and the SC (owe the irony oar^^), is there a third or more? 

A "friend" is counting on either a Tea Party, Conservative or Republican landslide this year.  But I am concerned with how branches work and how if there were already two, how Godwin[!] might play[?] Which is a sarcasm[!]slash[?]tangent on the hazzards of branching.

* not to target
** un-like Ike (USC)
Tin Foil Herman
R.S.V.P.
Mmmm MOW, MOW

^ oar shrug heads?(sc)
^^ paddle Fiscal Cliff and (YOU)Scroll Click or NEO-CONservative bent

[!] punctuation mark for irony/sarcasm/rhetorical***

*** anachronistic inserts [Francis Fukuyama was in the crowd that plowed the field and half regrets it.]
^^^ 3-body fig Newtons.or Phig Physics

BTW: USC is one of my alma maters.  UW the other.  But here I play on the initialism of "You Scroll Click" and Al Gore Rhythms and anomalies of the (b.s.) blog search[!]   

Final Note: Under wiki of Divide And Conquer ? [!] (or pyth helmet ?)

Go Hawks !